wavelength

Dark Adaptation Red Alert

Dark Adaptation Red Alert

I’ve wondered about the use of red for brake lights and tail lights. It’s a standardized system coded many years ago for countries to follow. But I sometimes have a hard time at night gauging where that car in front of me really is so I don’t have to slam on my brakes. Throw in some head lights and glare from oncoming cars and it’s not a pretty thing trying to stay out of trouble.

Most of you know about the rods and cones in our eyes, the light detecting photoreceptors in our retinas that is. During daylight hours when inside with normal lighting or outside during the daytime, our vision is sharp (for most of us) owing to how those cones work. They’re good for that kind of lighting. In very dark places we have the other photoreceptors, the rods, to help detect dim light but not colors. The rods don’t help at all with sharpness but they do tell us if there is a light on somewhere and those cells connect to each other unlike cones so they can add to each other’s light sensing effect. All those photoreceptors are working practically all the time but there is a light level where the rods and cones might shift to whichever is more effective for that lighting. See below for that graph.

But red light is a special thing. We detect light between 400nm and 760nm. This is the rainbow of colors where 400nm (nanometers) is violet. At the other end of the visible range of light we can detect, 760nm is red which has the least amount of energy of all the others. But violet isn’t just 400nm. It could look violet-ish at 430nm. And the same goes for red, give or take. And before all hell breaks loose here, I’ve read the visible spectrum may start a little lower than 400nm and the upper end might be a little higher than 760nm. Websites are all over the place with numbers and that’s like a lot of things by the way. Some things in life aren’t always clear or exact.

Here’s the great thing about red. If you turn off all lights and just use red light, you can see with it…of course…(even though the other cones are basically switched off). Maybe you won’t see as easily than with regular lighting but we can read (not red letters though). And why does any of that matter? If you want to be dark adapted, meaning, if you want to see in the dark but still need to read something written, you can do it with red light and it won’t negatively affect your ability to have good vision in the dark (by good I mean as good as we can possibly see in the dark). This is why red (I think) was chosen as the light color for brake and tail lights for at least night driving. This is also why you will find red lights in dark places like movie theaters or those exit signs we have everywhere. Red light won’t ruin your adapting to dark or dimly lit places.

And this is also interesting about red…..there is a point when lights get so dim that you can’t differentiate colors but if something has a red color you can still see it (not it’s red color but you can tell it’s there). When light is eventually dimmed completely, then there is no light at all for your eyes to detect (total darkness) so red is the last color standing! And…red alert means it’s getting pretty serious :), as in war time serious. Hiding in the dark still required seeing so red lights helped and pilots kept their dark adaptation by using red light or red goggles.

One more thing about red light. That long wavelength (almost twice as long as violet) actually focuses a bit “behind” our retina so those needing reading glasses or getting close to needing them…might have to bump up the reading power a bit if you’re going to read best in red light.

http://www.aoa.org/optometrists/tools-and-resources/clinical-care-publications/aviation-vision/the-eye-and-night-vision

This is a particular interesting “web book” on vision….http://www.yorku.ca/eye/thejoy.htm

light dark graph

light dark graph

 

Enhanced by Zemanta
More microwave oven vision nonsense!

More microwave oven vision nonsense!

Here are a few other things that I wanted to say about microwave ovens and our vision. First, there’s a window in the door so you can see your food cooking. I don’t know that I’ve ever seen a microwave oven without a window. Yesterday I wrote a post about the frequency of the energy that microwave ovens generate (actually 2.45 GHz) but I didn’t say how long the wavelengths are. They are about 4.6 inches. There’s a simple formula to calculate that. I’ll be honest, this next part kinda makes sense but then I can’t fully explain this. Yet.

That screen in the microwave oven door has little holes so we can see through it. The spacing of those holes is about 1 mm. Or in inches, 0.039. Because the wavelength of the microwaves is so much larger than the hole size in the screen, the microwaves can’t get through. But visible light can get through because the wavelength of light is way smaller than those little holes. So in essence, that screen is like a solid wall for microwaves but not for visible light.

This next thing about that screen is something I can’t fully explain either but I think I have an idea why this thing I do works. If I don’t move my head when I’m looking through that screen I don’t see what’s inside very well. But if I move my head back and forth (side to side) in front of the screen I can see what’s inside much better. I looked up persistence of vision in wikipedia and of course, there was nothing about me moving my head side-to-side and cooking my food. But, the reason I can see better in the microwave when moving my head is that the images are quickly changing. I’m making a movie (sorta in reverse) by moving my head! I made that up but I think I’m pretty close to getting this right.

Movies are just a bunch of pictures that when shown at a certain rate it makes you think something is moving. A typical “frame rate” is 24 pictures per second. There is a fraction of time when there is nothing but we don’t see that. We don’t see that “black” moment. If you move your head in front of that microwave screen I’m guessing that those little holes are so small that you’re moving faster than 24 holes per second or enough to be obviously better than 1 hole per second. Because our visual system has a persistence that lasts the teeniest bit longer than when the actual image was there, it’s able to combine all those images into a clearer picture. Don’t hold me to this explanation too much but I’m onto something….I think. Someone else told me this is saccadic masking.

Try it anyway. Just move your head from side-to-side in front of the microwave while telling your family you’re not crazy.

http://www.exploratorium.edu/snacks/persistence_of_vision/

microwave oven screen

microwave oven screen

 

Enhanced by Zemanta